Describe the job.

Set filters, get ranked options with verified scores and source dates attached.

Refine

Describe the job, then tune.

Results update live as you type. The button applies preset and filter changes inferred from your wording.

Query

Live update · Preset · Coding copilot · All public sources

Current questionCoding copilot with all public sources

Use case

Strong coding performance with enough reasoning depth to debug and refactor, not just autocomplete.

Sources to include

All public sources can include official company results while independent results catch up.

Access model

Primary filters

Current scoring recipecoverage, recency, and included sources

This preset weights coding, reasoning math science, long context with a 55% coverage floor and a 120-day recency window. Official company results can contribute when they are clearly labeled. Copied, historical, and demo data stay out unless you explicitly allow them.

Recommendation · Coding copilot

Best evidence-backed choices for Coding copilot with all public sources: Claude Fable 5, Claude Opus 4.8, ERNIE 5.1, and Claude Opus 4.7.

Claude Fable 5Anthropic · frontier

Verified & stable

The current evidence supports a shortlist, not a single winner.

Direct sources: 16
Coverage: 100%
Data version: Aug 19, 2026

Compare top options Share this report

100fit

Evidence behind the call

Data version Aug 19, 202616 direct source linksNo excluded sourcesAll public sources

What the data can support5 ready, 1 partial, 1 missing for the current task result.

Minimum source requirementenough direct data · enough direct data · enough direct data · enough direct data

Cost / latencyLatency is unavailable in the current verified source data.

Current top picksClaude Fable 5, Claude Opus 4.8, ERNIE 5.1, Claude Opus 4.7

Answer typeTop picks, not one winner

Coverage100% visible · 100% checked

PresetCoding copilot

SourcesAll public sources

Latest strong source dataAug 19, 2026

Where sources differ4 source rows behind this answer

Claude Fable 5Artificial Analysis · Terminal-Bench Hard · 62.879 · #1 · 100pctl

used for answer

Claude Fable 5Artificial Analysis · SciCode · 60.185 · #1 · 100pctl

used for answer

Claude Fable 5Artificial Analysis · Humanity's Last Exam · 55.468 · #1 · 100pctl

used for answer

Claude Fable 5Arena · Code Arena · 1,653.932 · #1 · 100pctl

used for answer

Compare top options Open comparison table Coverage report

Ranked options

Direct matches first, then weaker or missing-data cases

Direct matches stay strict; strong models with indirect data still surface below. Open a row for its scores, source links, and caveats.

Primary group · Direct-match leaders

#1Claude Fable 5Anthropic · frontier100.0100% visible

enough direct data · recent · strong · clearfrontier-priced price band from registry metadataLatency is unavailable in the current verified source data.

Visible tradeoffs1.5% score spread · 71.7% recent data · exact alias

Fit score100.0

Strongest source datareasoning math science · coding

Claude Fable 5 is strongest on Reasoning / math / science and Coding for this preset.

Last updated: Latest visible source row is 0 days old.
Where sources differ: 2-point cross-domain spread; warning threshold is 30.
Data checks: No open review item was matched to this recommendation.

The visible evidence mix still leans on weaker or split signals, especially around Long context, source verification state, and any backfilled or relay evidence still in play.

Data parser or model matching changes recently moved Artificial Analysis, Arena, Vals AI.

Verified rows: 27
Hand-checked rows: 0
Copied rows: 0
Backfilled rows: 0

Headline lane: Aug 19, 2026
Background data: No extra context

Formula recommendation-fit-v2.0.0.

Source linksArtificial AnalysisTerminal-Bench Hard · 62.879 · #1 · 100pctl Artificial AnalysisSciCode · 60.185 · #1 · 100pctl Artificial AnalysisHumanity's Last Exam · 55.468 · #1 · 100pctl

Measured by: public third-party sources
Source basis: exact alias
Compared fairly because: same test setup, version groups, source-balanced before averaging

Open model

Open compare

#2Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic · frontier100.0100% visible

enough direct data · recent · strong · clearfrontier-priced price band from registry metadataLatency is unavailable in the current verified source data.

Visible tradeoffs6.8% score spread · 71.9% recent data · exact alias

Fit score100.0

Strongest source datareasoning math science · coding

Claude Opus 4.8 is strongest on Reasoning / math / science and Coding for this preset.

Last updated: Latest visible source row is 0 days old.
Where sources differ: 7-point cross-domain spread; warning threshold is 30.
Data checks: No open review item was matched to this recommendation.

The visible evidence mix still leans on weaker or split signals, especially around Long context, source verification state, and any backfilled or relay evidence still in play.

Data parser or model matching changes recently moved Artificial Analysis, Arena, Vals AI.

Verified rows: 26
Hand-checked rows: 0
Copied rows: 0
Backfilled rows: 0

Headline lane: Aug 19, 2026
Background data: No extra context

Formula recommendation-fit-v2.0.0.

Source linksArtificial AnalysisTerminal-Bench Hard · 58.333 · #3 · 99pctl Artificial AnalysisHumanity's Last Exam · 48.656 · #6 · 99pctl ArenaText Arena · Coding · 1,539.904 · #5 · 99pctl

Measured by: public third-party sources
Source basis: exact alias
Compared fairly because: same test setup, version groups, source-balanced before averaging

Open model

Open compare

#3ERNIE 5.1Baidu · frontier95.367% visible

enough direct data · recent · strong · clearfrontier-priced price band from registry metadataLatency is unavailable in the current verified source data.

Verified but aging1.5% score spread · 55% recent data · exact alias

Fit score95.3

Strongest source datareasoning math science · coding

ERNIE 5.1 is strongest on Reasoning / math / science and Coding for this preset.

Last updated: Latest visible source row is 64 days old.
Where sources differ: 2-point cross-domain spread; warning threshold is 30.
Data checks: No open review item was matched to this recommendation.

The verified evidence is decent, but too much of it is aging to treat this as a clean current winner.

Data parser or model matching changes recently moved Arena.

Verified rows: 4
Hand-checked rows: 0
Copied rows: 0
Backfilled rows: 0

Headline lane: Jun 16, 2026
Background data: No extra context

Formula recommendation-fit-v2.0.0.

Source linksArenaText Arena · Math · No Style Control · 1,481.743 · #10 · 97pctl ArenaText Arena · Math · 1,480.737 · #12 · 96pctl ArenaText Arena · Coding · No Style Control · 1,489.664 · #14 · 96pctl

Measured by: public third-party sources
Source basis: exact alias
Compared fairly because: same test setup, version groups, source-balanced before averaging

Open model

Open compare

#4Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic · frontier91.3official100% visible

Official company result included

enough direct data · stale only · strong · clearfrontier-priced price band from registry metadataLatency is unavailable in the current verified source data.

Verified but aging5.2% score spread · 64.8% recent data · exact direct

Fit score91.3

Strongest source datareasoning math science · long context

Claude Opus 4.7 is strongest on Reasoning / math / science and Long context for this preset.

Last updated: Only background data or rows older than 90 days are visible.
Where sources differ: 5-point cross-domain spread; warning threshold is 30.
Data checks: No open review item was matched to this recommendation.

Provider-official evidence is self-reported company data. It can support recency, but it is not third-party test data.

The verified evidence is decent, but too much of it is aging to treat this as a clean current winner.

Some visible coverage is coming from provider-official source links while independent coverage catches up.

Verified rows: 37
Hand-checked rows: 3
Copied rows: 0
Backfilled rows: 0

Headline lane: Aug 19, 2026
Background data: No extra context

Formula recommendation-fit-v2.0.0.

Source linksArenaCode Arena · Image To Webdev · 1,580.746 · #1 · 100pctl BridgeBenchRefactoring · 75.2 · #1 · 100pctl Provider official evalsHumanity's Last Exam · 46.9 · #1 · 100pctl

Measured by: mixed independent and provider-official sources
Source basis: exact direct
Compared fairly because: same test setup, version groups, source-balanced before averaging

Open model

Open compare

#5GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI · frontier88.9100% visible

Source status unavailablefrontier price bandLatency unavailable

Visible tradeoffs17.9% score spread · 78.9% recent data · exact alias

Fit score88.9

Strongest source datacoding · reasoning math science

GPT-5.6 Sol is strongest on Coding and Reasoning / math / science for this preset.

The visible evidence mix still leans on weaker or split signals, especially around Long context, source verification state, and any backfilled or relay evidence still in play.

Data parser or model matching changes recently moved Artificial Analysis, LiveBench.

Verified rows: 25
Hand-checked rows: 0
Copied rows: 0
Backfilled rows: 0

Headline lane: Aug 19, 2026
Background data: No extra context

Formula recommendation-fit-v2.0.0.

No source link clears the minimum source requirement.

Measured by: public third-party sources
Source basis: exact alias
Compared fairly because: same test setup, version groups, source-balanced before averaging

Open model

Open compare

Evidence & limits

Read the argument before you commit

Why these options made the listtop reasons behind the current answer

Current shortlist: Claude Fable 5, Claude Opus 4.8, ERNIE 5.1, and Claude Opus 4.7.
Claude Fable 5 is the strongest exact-match option still visible.
Claude Fable 5 currently leads the fit score at 100.0, but the evidence is still too mixed for a single headline winner.

What to pressure testwhere the current answer is still fragile

No single winner: The current public evidence is only strong enough to support a shortlist, not one winner.
Strongest alternative · Claude Opus 4.8: Claude Opus 4.8 is strongest on Reasoning / math / science and Coding for this preset.
Evidence risk: The visible evidence mix still leans on weaker or split signals, especially around Long context, source verification state, and any backfilled or relay evidence still in play.

What would flip the answerthe assumptions the result rests on

If you tighten benchmark spread: Claude Fable 5 still holds if you care more about aligned evidence than upside.
If you tighten recency: Claude Fable 5 remains viable because the visible evidence is still fairly fresh.
If you require open-weight: No open-weight model currently clears the same evidence floor.
If cost and speed matter more: No clearly cheaper alternative currently clears the same evidence floor.

Why this is not a clean winlimitations to keep in mind

The current evidence supports a shortlist, not a single winner.
Claude Opus 4.8 remains close enough that a different scoring recipe can still flip the public answer.

Source links6 rows behind this answer

Artificial Analysis · Terminal-Bench Hard · 62.879 · #1 · 100pctl
Artificial Analysis · SciCode · 60.185 · #1 · 100pctl
Artificial Analysis · Humanity's Last Exam · 55.468 · #1 · 100pctl
Arena · Code Arena · 1,653.932 · #1 · 100pctl
Artificial Analysis · Terminal-Bench Hard · 58.333 · #3 · 99pctl
Artificial Analysis · Humanity's Last Exam · 48.656 · #6 · 99pctl

Data limitswhere the public data is thin

cost: partial · Only registry price bands are ready; exact price calculations are not shown.
latency: missing · Latency is not available in the current verified shortlist data.

Not chosen6 well-known models left off

Grok 4.3

Closest option

Grok 4.3 has direct evidence on part of this preset, but not enough to clear the exact-match floor.

Open model

GPT-5.4 mini

Closest option

GPT-5.4 mini has direct evidence on part of this preset, but not enough to clear the exact-match floor.

Open model

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Closest option

Gemini 3.5 Flash has direct evidence on part of this preset, but not enough to clear the exact-match floor.

Open model

GPT-5.4 nano

Closest option

GPT-5.4 nano has direct evidence on part of this preset, but not enough to clear the exact-match floor.

Open model

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Closest option

Gemini 3.1 Pro has direct evidence on part of this preset, but not enough to clear the exact-match floor.

Open model

Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental

Known current model

Current generated catalog does not have enough matching source links for this task preset.

codingreasoning math science

Open model

alert

8 review items still need manual judgment

The product keeps parser and mapping ambiguity visible instead of silently guessing.

Open

models

Arena moved via real benchmark movement

80 benchmark rows were added, 4 removed, and 16276 existing rows changed value or evaluation date. Window: 2026-06-20T23:37:10Z -> 2026-06-24T03:37:55Z.

Open

models

Artificial Analysis moved via real benchmark movement

28 benchmark rows were added, 0 removed, and 5949 existing rows changed value or evaluation date. Window: 2026-06-20T23:37:17Z -> 2026-06-24T03:38:09Z.

Open

models

BridgeBench moved via new benchmark coverage

10 benchmark rows were added, 10 removed, and 0 existing rows changed value or evaluation date. Window: 2026-05-15T16:26:59Z -> 2026-05-15T16:34:46Z.

Open

sources

LLMBase moved via source updated leaderboard

The saved raw source snapshot changed relative to the previous run. Window: 2026-06-20T23:37:24Z -> 2026-06-24T03:38:25Z.

Open

What changed this week

alert

229 review items still need manual judgment

The product keeps parser and mapping ambiguity visible instead of silently guessing.

Open

models

Arena moved via real benchmark movement

80 benchmark rows were added, 4 removed, and 16276 existing rows changed value or evaluation date. Window: 2026-06-20T23:37:10Z -> 2026-06-24T03:37:55Z.

Source-data window: 2026-06-20T23:37:10Z -> 2026-06-24T03:37:55Z

Open report Model Benchmark Source

models

Artificial Analysis moved via real benchmark movement

0 benchmark rows were added, 1 removed, and 1 existing rows changed value or evaluation date. Window: 2026-08-19T04:01:26Z -> 2026-08-19T04:03:57Z.

Source-data window: 2026-08-19T04:01:26Z -> 2026-08-19T04:03:57Z

Open report Model Benchmark Source

models

BridgeBench moved via new benchmark coverage

10 benchmark rows were added, 10 removed, and 0 existing rows changed value or evaluation date. Window: 2026-05-15T16:26:59Z -> 2026-05-15T16:34:46Z.

Source-data window: 2026-05-15T16:26:59Z -> 2026-05-15T16:34:46Z

Open report Model Benchmark Source

models

LiveBench moved via new benchmark coverage

651 benchmark rows were added, 0 removed, and 0 existing rows changed value or evaluation date. Window: 2026-08-19T04:01:41Z -> 2026-08-19T04:04:19Z.

Source-data window: 2026-08-19T04:01:41Z -> 2026-08-19T04:04:19Z

Open report Model Benchmark Source

product

Initial comparison-table release

Added comparison-table homepage, same-test normalization, per-cell source links, source pages, and custom-ranking preview.

Source-data window: 2026-04-16

Open changelog

models

Methodology contract published

Documented comparability rules, raw-vs-normalized behavior, and why unlike metrics are never averaged by default.

Source-data window: 2026-04-16

models

Artificial Analysis ID rule adopted

Stable model and creator IDs are now the preferred external identity keys when available.

Source-data window: 2026-04-15

Watchlists

Followed items reopen from their canonical URL first. Bundle export still works, but the durable state is the href plus deterministic latest-delta links, not a rebuilt local compare preset.

Open workspaces

Loading watchlist state...

No watchlists yet. Follow a recommendation card or compare set.

Saved compare views

Loading saved compare views...

Save a compare workspace to keep top options around.

Workspace bundle

Portable bundles stay link-native. Use them to preview a shared workspace, reopen the same compare URLs on another device, or import the snapshot without reconstructing intent from loose local fields.

Current workspace0 saved compare views · 0 watches · 0 pinned compare models

Preview or import a shared bundle

Data version

Current snapshot.

Published Aug 19, 2026Model list checked2 stale sources216 claim warnings9 providers · 1149 tracked models

Freshness is calculated at request time. Failed sources retain their last verified rows with a visible age penalty. View live data status.

Quick routes

Jump straight to a page.

Resolve a recommendation into a public reportbest open model for long-context researchResearch assistantOpen page

Send a shortlist into compare modecompare gpt-5, claude opus, gemini proEveryday chatbotOpen page

Open a head-to-head debate pagegpt-5 vs claude opusEveryday chatbotOpen page

Open a source-difference reportbenchmark controversy for livebench codingCoding copilotOpen page

Open the latest public movementwhat changed this weekEveryday chatbotOpen page

Jump straight to an entity pageopen model gpt-5Open-weight shortlistOpen page

Describe the job.

Best evidence-backed choices for Coding copilot with all public sources: Claude Fable 5, Claude Opus 4.8, ERNIE 5.1, and Claude Opus 4.7.

Direct matches first, then weaker or missing-data cases

Read the argument before you commit

Grok 4.3

GPT-5.4 mini

Gemini 3.5 Flash

GPT-5.4 nano

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental

Grok 4.3

GPT-5.4 mini

Gemini 3.5 Flash

GPT-5.4 nano

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Gemini 3 Pro Preview

Grok 4.20

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview

Gemini 3 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Pro

GPT-5

Shareable claims with evidence

What changed this week

Current snapshot.

Jump straight to a page.