UAB

Claude Opus 4.7

Live · updated continuously

MenuClaude Opus 4.7

Find

Find a model Comparison table Score overview

Browse

Models Benchmarks Sources Compare

Method

Data status Data & sources Scoring method Methodology Changelog

Model profile · Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.7

Closed weightsfrontier · registry tag 2026 flagship

Thin verified coverage

Reads as thin verified coverage across the resolved source data.

Visible coverage: 47.9%
Verified coverage: 45.2%
Spread: 92.4%
Last verified: Aug 19, 2026

77%bench fit

textcodevisiondocumentsearch7 aliases47 official source links

UAB

Live · updated continuously

MenuLoading

Find

Find a model Comparison table Score overview

Browse

Models Benchmarks Sources Compare

Method

Data status Data & sources Scoring method Methodology Changelog

Model detail

Loading model evidence.

Preparing the model profile, benchmark coverage, and registry evidence.

Source-linked scores by benchmark

Each row keeps the benchmark source, source type, raw metric, and percentile inside its fair comparison set.

Thin verified coverageThis model currently reads as thin verified coverage across the resolved source data.

Chat / text28 benchmarks79.2%

Intelligence Index

AA · Chat / text · Combined

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #29 · Source label: Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Artificial Analysis
Raw value: 44
Percentile: 94%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Artificial Analysis public leaderboard field `intelligenceIndex`.

94% percentile inside its fair comparison set

44Raw benchmark value

AA-Omniscience accuracy

AA · Chat / text · Objective

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #26 · Source label: Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Artificial Analysis
Raw value: 44.7%
Percentile: 93.2%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Artificial Analysis public leaderboard field `omniscienceAccuracy`.

93.2% percentile inside its fair comparison set

44.7%Raw benchmark value

AA-Omniscience non-hallucination

AA · Chat / text · Objective

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #63 · Source label: Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Artificial Analysis
Raw value: 45.9%
Percentile: 83.1%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Artificial Analysis public leaderboard field `omniscienceNonHallucination`.

83.1% percentile inside its fair comparison set

45.9%Raw benchmark value

IFBench

AA · Chat / text · Objective

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #151 · Source label: Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Artificial Analysis
Raw value: 43.6%
Percentile: 56.5%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Artificial Analysis public leaderboard field `ifbench`.

56.5% percentile inside its fair comparison set

43.6%Raw benchmark value

Blended price

AA · Chat / text · Speed / cost

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #282 · Source label: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Artificial Analysis
Raw value: $10 /1M tokens
Percentile: 7.6%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Artificial Analysis public leaderboard field `price1mBlended0To3To1`.

7.6% percentile inside its fair comparison set

$10 /1M tokensRaw benchmark value

Input price

AA · Chat / text · Speed / cost

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #284 · Source label: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Artificial Analysis
Raw value: $5 /1M input tokens
Percentile: 8%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Artificial Analysis public leaderboard field `price1mInputTokens`.

8% percentile inside its fair comparison set

$5 /1M input tokensRaw benchmark value

Output price

AA · Chat / text · Speed / cost

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #282 · Source label: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Artificial Analysis
Raw value: $25 /1M output tokens
Percentile: 7.6%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Artificial Analysis public leaderboard field `price1mOutputTokens`.

7.6% percentile inside its fair comparison set

$25 /1M output tokensRaw benchmark value

Output Speed

AA · Chat / text · Speed / cost

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #196 · Source label: Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Artificial Analysis
Raw value: 43.6 tokens/s
Percentile: 12.9%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Artificial Analysis public leaderboard field `medianOutputTokensPerSecond`.

12.9% percentile inside its fair comparison set

43.6 tokens/sRaw benchmark value

Time to first token

AA · Chat / text · Speed / cost

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #191 · Source label: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Artificial Analysis
Raw value: 15.61s
Percentile: 15.2%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Artificial Analysis public leaderboard field `medianTimeToFirstTokenSeconds`.

15.2% percentile inside its fair comparison set

15.61sRaw benchmark value

Time to first answer token

AA · Chat / text · Speed / cost

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #108 · Source label: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Artificial Analysis
Raw value: 15.61s
Percentile: 52.2%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Artificial Analysis public leaderboard field `medianTimeToFirstAnswerTokenSeconds`.

52.2% percentile inside its fair comparison set

15.61sRaw benchmark value

Text Arena

AR · Chat / text · Human

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #3 · Source label: claude-opus-4-7-thinking

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Arena
Raw value: 1,502
Percentile: 99.4%
Last updated: aging
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Arena leaderboard dataset row `claude-opus-4-7-thinking`. Category: overall. Source rank: #3. Votes: 32629. Organization: anthropic. License: Proprietary.

99.4% percentile inside its fair comparison set

1,502Raw benchmark valueCI 1,498 - 1,507

Text Arena · Creative Writing

AR · Chat / text · Human

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #3 · Source label: claude-opus-4-7-thinking

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Arena
Raw value: 1,486
Percentile: 99.4%
Last updated: aging
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Arena leaderboard dataset row `claude-opus-4-7-thinking`. Category: creative_writing. Source rank: #3. Votes: 5500. Organization: anthropic. License: Proprietary.

99.4% percentile inside its fair comparison set

1,486Raw benchmark valueCI 1,477 - 1,495

Text Arena · English

AR · Chat / text · Human

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #3 · Source label: claude-opus-4-7-thinking

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Arena
Raw value: 1,509
Percentile: 99.4%
Last updated: aging
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Arena leaderboard dataset row `claude-opus-4-7-thinking`. Category: english. Source rank: #3. Votes: 15799. Organization: anthropic. License: Proprietary.

99.4% percentile inside its fair comparison set

1,509Raw benchmark valueCI 1,503 - 1,514

Text Arena · Exclude Ties

AR · Chat / text · Human

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #3 · Source label: claude-opus-4-7-thinking

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Arena
Raw value: 1,520
Percentile: 99.4%
Last updated: aging
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Arena leaderboard dataset row `claude-opus-4-7-thinking`. Category: exclude_ties. Source rank: #3. Votes: 25085. Organization: anthropic. License: Proprietary.

99.4% percentile inside its fair comparison set

1,520Raw benchmark valueCI 1,514 - 1,526

Text Arena · Hard Prompts

AR · Chat / text · Human

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #3 · Source label: claude-opus-4-7-thinking

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Arena
Raw value: 1,524
Percentile: 99.4%
Last updated: aging
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Arena leaderboard dataset row `claude-opus-4-7-thinking`. Category: hard_prompts. Source rank: #4. Votes: 21557. Organization: anthropic. License: Proprietary.

99.4% percentile inside its fair comparison set

1,524Raw benchmark valueCI 1,519 - 1,530

Text Arena · Hard Prompts English

AR · Chat / text · Human

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #3 · Source label: claude-opus-4-7-thinking

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Arena
Raw value: 1,527
Percentile: 99.4%
Last updated: aging
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Arena leaderboard dataset row `claude-opus-4-7-thinking`. Category: hard_prompts_english. Source rank: #4. Votes: 10929. Organization: anthropic. License: Proprietary.

99.4% percentile inside its fair comparison set

1,527Raw benchmark valueCI 1,520 - 1,534

Text Arena · Instruction Following

AR · Chat / text · Human

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #3 · Source label: claude-opus-4-7-thinking

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Arena
Raw value: 1,504
Percentile: 99.4%
Last updated: aging
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Arena leaderboard dataset row `claude-opus-4-7-thinking`. Category: instruction_following. Source rank: #3. Votes: 11075. Organization: anthropic. License: Proprietary.

99.4% percentile inside its fair comparison set

1,504Raw benchmark valueCI 1,497 - 1,511

Text Arena · Longer Query

AR · Chat / text · Human

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #3 · Source label: claude-opus-4-7-thinking

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Arena
Raw value: 1,514
Percentile: 99.3%
Last updated: aging
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Arena leaderboard dataset row `claude-opus-4-7-thinking`. Category: longer_query. Source rank: #4. Votes: 14253. Organization: anthropic. License: Proprietary.

99.3% percentile inside its fair comparison set

1,514Raw benchmark valueCI 1,508 - 1,521

Text Arena · Multi Turn

AR · Chat / text · Human

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #2 · Source label: claude-opus-4-7-thinking

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Arena
Raw value: 1,517
Percentile: 99.7%
Last updated: aging
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Arena leaderboard dataset row `claude-opus-4-7-thinking`. Category: multi_turn. Source rank: #2. Votes: 5605. Organization: anthropic. License: Proprietary.

99.7% percentile inside its fair comparison set

1,517Raw benchmark valueCI 1,508 - 1,526

Text Arena · No Style Control

AR · Chat / text · Human

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #3 · Source label: claude-opus-4-7-thinking

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Arena
Raw value: 1,489
Percentile: 99.4%
Last updated: aging
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Arena leaderboard dataset row `claude-opus-4-7-thinking`. Category: overall. Source rank: #4. Votes: 32629. Organization: anthropic. License: Proprietary.

99.4% percentile inside its fair comparison set

1,489Raw benchmark valueCI 1,485 - 1,494

Text Arena · Creative Writing · No Style Control

AR · Chat / text · Human

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #5 · Source label: claude-opus-4-7-thinking

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Arena
Raw value: 1,481
Percentile: 98.8%
Last updated: aging
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Arena leaderboard dataset row `claude-opus-4-7-thinking`. Category: creative_writing. Source rank: #6. Votes: 5500. Organization: anthropic. License: Proprietary.

98.8% percentile inside its fair comparison set

1,481Raw benchmark valueCI 1,472 - 1,490

Text Arena · English · No Style Control

AR · Chat / text · Human

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #3 · Source label: claude-opus-4-7-thinking

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Arena
Raw value: 1,493
Percentile: 99.4%
Last updated: aging
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Arena leaderboard dataset row `claude-opus-4-7-thinking`. Category: english. Source rank: #4. Votes: 15799. Organization: anthropic. License: Proprietary.

99.4% percentile inside its fair comparison set

1,493Raw benchmark valueCI 1,488 - 1,499

Text Arena · Exclude Ties · No Style Control

AR · Chat / text · Human

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #3 · Source label: claude-opus-4-7-thinking

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Arena
Raw value: 1,500
Percentile: 99.4%
Last updated: aging
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Arena leaderboard dataset row `claude-opus-4-7-thinking`. Category: exclude_ties. Source rank: #4. Votes: 25085. Organization: anthropic. License: Proprietary.

99.4% percentile inside its fair comparison set

1,500Raw benchmark valueCI 1,494 - 1,506

Text Arena · Hard Prompts · No Style Control

AR · Chat / text · Human

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #3 · Source label: claude-opus-4-7-thinking

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Arena
Raw value: 1,503
Percentile: 99.4%
Last updated: aging
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Arena leaderboard dataset row `claude-opus-4-7-thinking`. Category: hard_prompts. Source rank: #4. Votes: 21557. Organization: anthropic. License: Proprietary.

99.4% percentile inside its fair comparison set

1,503Raw benchmark valueCI 1,497 - 1,508

Text Arena · Hard Prompts English · No Style Control

AR · Chat / text · Human

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #3 · Source label: claude-opus-4-7-thinking

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Arena
Raw value: 1,505
Percentile: 99.4%
Last updated: aging
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Arena leaderboard dataset row `claude-opus-4-7-thinking`. Category: hard_prompts_english. Source rank: #4. Votes: 10929. Organization: anthropic. License: Proprietary.

99.4% percentile inside its fair comparison set

1,505Raw benchmark valueCI 1,498 - 1,512

Text Arena · Instruction Following · No Style Control

AR · Chat / text · Human

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #3 · Source label: claude-opus-4-7-thinking

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Arena
Raw value: 1,497
Percentile: 99.4%
Last updated: aging
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Arena leaderboard dataset row `claude-opus-4-7-thinking`. Category: instruction_following. Source rank: #4. Votes: 11075. Organization: anthropic. License: Proprietary.

99.4% percentile inside its fair comparison set

1,497Raw benchmark valueCI 1,490 - 1,504

Text Arena · Longer Query · No Style Control

AR · Chat / text · Human

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #3 · Source label: claude-opus-4-7-thinking

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Arena
Raw value: 1,502
Percentile: 99.3%
Last updated: aging
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Arena leaderboard dataset row `claude-opus-4-7-thinking`. Category: longer_query. Source rank: #4. Votes: 14253. Organization: anthropic. License: Proprietary.

99.3% percentile inside its fair comparison set

1,502Raw benchmark valueCI 1,496 - 1,509

Text Arena · Multi Turn · No Style Control

AR · Chat / text · Human

It tests whether the model is actually useful in normal conversational turns, not just on narrow correctness tasks.

Rank #3

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Arena
Raw value: 1,505
Percentile: 99.4%
Last updated: aging
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Arena leaderboard dataset row `claude-opus-4-7`. Category: multi_turn. Source rank: #3. Votes: 5978. Organization: anthropic. License: Proprietary.

99.4% percentile inside its fair comparison set

1,505Raw benchmark valueCI 1,496 - 1,514

Coding32 benchmarks84.5%

Terminal-Bench Hard

AA · Coding · Objective

It tells you whether the model can generate, repair, and reason over code under evaluator pressure rather than marketing examples.

Rank #5 · Source label: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Artificial Analysis
Raw value: 51.5%
Percentile: 98.8%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Artificial Analysis public leaderboard field `terminalbenchHard`.

98.8% percentile inside its fair comparison set

51.5%Raw benchmark value

SciCode

AA · Coding · Objective

It tells you whether the model can generate, repair, and reason over code under evaluator pressure rather than marketing examples.

Rank #24 · Source label: Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Artificial Analysis
Raw value: 50.1%
Percentile: 94.8%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Artificial Analysis public leaderboard field `scicode`.

Reasoning / math / science11 benchmarks89.4%

Humanity's Last Exam

AA · Reasoning / math / science · Objective

It is one of the cleaner reads on deliberate reasoning strength rather than style or popularity.

Rank #36 · Source label: Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Artificial Analysis
Raw value: 33.3%
Percentile: 92.1%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Artificial Analysis public leaderboard field `hle`.

92.1% percentile inside its fair comparison set

33.3%Raw benchmark value

GPQA

AA · Reasoning / math / science · Objective

It is one of the cleaner reads on deliberate reasoning strength rather than style or popularity.

Rank #34 · Source label: Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Artificial Analysis
Raw value: 88.5%
Percentile: 92.7%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Artificial Analysis public leaderboard field `gpqa`.

Professional reasoning28 benchmarks93.9%

GDPval-AA

AA · Professional reasoning · Rubric

Agentic performance on economically valuable work tasks.

Rank #19 · Source label: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Artificial Analysis
Raw value: 1,490
Percentile: 89.4%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Artificial Analysis public leaderboard field `gdpvalBreakdown.elo`.

89.4% percentile inside its fair comparison set

1,490Raw benchmark value

Vals Index

VALS-AI · Professional reasoning · Combined

Weighted model performance across economically relevant Vals tasks.

Rank #4 · Source label: anthropic/claude-opus-4-7

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Vals AI
Raw value: 66
Percentile: 88.5%
Last updated: aging
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Vals AI BenchmarkView overall scores. Vals slug: vals_index; provider: Anthropic.

Search / tool use4 benchmarks71.6%

Tau2-Bench Telecom

AA · Search / tool use · Objective

It matters when the model must browse, call tools, and recover useful answers from external systems.

Rank #92 · Source label: Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Artificial Analysis
Raw value: 74%
Percentile: 72.9%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Artificial Analysis public leaderboard field `tau2`.

72.9% percentile inside its fair comparison set

74%Raw benchmark value

Search Arena

AR · Search / tool use · Human

It matters when the model must browse, call tools, and recover useful answers from external systems.

Rank #4

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Arena
Raw value: 1,211
Percentile: 90%
Last updated: aging
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Arena leaderboard dataset row `claude-opus-4-7`. Category: overall. Source rank: #4. Votes: 38472. Organization: anthropic. License: Proprietary.

Long context2 benchmarks87.8%

Long Context Reasoning

AA · Long context · Objective

It checks whether long-context claims survive contact with retrieval, memory, or long-document tasks.

Rank #38 · Source label: Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Artificial Analysis
Raw value: 72.3%
Percentile: 90.4%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Artificial Analysis public leaderboard field `lcr`.

90.4% percentile inside its fair comparison set

72.3%Raw benchmark value

CorpFin v2

VALS-AI · Long context · Objective

It checks whether long-context claims survive contact with retrieval, memory, or long-document tasks.

Rank #14 · Source label: anthropic/claude-opus-4-7

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Vals AI
Raw value: 66.1%
Percentile: 85.2%
Last updated: aging
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Vals AI BenchmarkView overall scores. Vals slug: corp_fin_v2; provider: Anthropic.

Vision understanding17 benchmarks94.3%

MMMU-Pro

AA · Vision understanding · Objective

It is useful when the model must read charts, UI, screenshots, or visual scenes rather than text alone.

Rank #26 · Source label: Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Artificial Analysis
Raw value: 76.4%
Percentile: 84.8%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Artificial Analysis public leaderboard field `mmmuPro`.

84.8% percentile inside its fair comparison set

76.4%Raw benchmark value

Vision Arena

AR · Vision understanding · Human

It is useful when the model must read charts, UI, screenshots, or visual scenes rather than text alone.

Rank #1 · Source label: claude-opus-4-7-thinking

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Arena
Raw value: 1,309
Percentile: 100%
Last updated: aging
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Arena leaderboard dataset row `claude-opus-4-7-thinking`. Category: overall. Source rank: #1. Votes: 13312. Organization: anthropic. License: Proprietary.

Document understanding5 benchmarks88%

Document Arena

AR · Document understanding · Human

It matters when the job is reading PDFs, tables, forms, or mixed-layout documents rather than plain chat.

Rank #2 · Source label: claude-opus-4-7-thinking

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Arena
Raw value: 1,497
Percentile: 95.8%
Last updated: aging
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Arena leaderboard dataset row `claude-opus-4-7-thinking`. Category: overall. Source rank: #2. Votes: 13878. Organization: anthropic. License: Proprietary.

95.8% percentile inside its fair comparison set

1,497Raw benchmark valueCI 1,490 - 1,504

Document Arena · No Style Control

AR · Document understanding · Human

It matters when the job is reading PDFs, tables, forms, or mixed-layout documents rather than plain chat.

Rank #2 · Source label: claude-opus-4-7-thinking

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Arena
Raw value: 1,498
Percentile: 95.8%
Last updated: aging
Eligibility

Multilingual16 benchmarks98.5%

Text Arena · Chinese

AR · Multilingual · Human

Observed user preference in Arena's Text Arena chinese leaderboard.

Rank #2 · Source label: claude-opus-4-7-thinking

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Arena
Raw value: 1,544
Percentile: 99.7%
Last updated: aging
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Arena leaderboard dataset row `claude-opus-4-7-thinking`. Category: chinese. Source rank: #3. Votes: 1738. Organization: anthropic. License: Proprietary.

99.7% percentile inside its fair comparison set

1,544Raw benchmark valueCI 1,529 - 1,560

Text Arena · French

AR · Multilingual · Human

Observed user preference in Arena's Text Arena french leaderboard.

Rank #4 · Source label: claude-opus-4-7-thinking

verified runtimeexact alias

Raw row drilldownsource row, percentile, last updated, eligibility

Source: Arena
Raw value: 1,517
Percentile: 98.6%
Last updated: aging
Eligibility: headline eligible

Parsed from Arena leaderboard dataset row `claude-opus-4-7-thinking`. Category: french. Source rank: #4. Votes: 1116. Organization: anthropic. License: Proprietary.