UAB

GPT-5.4 Pro (xhigh) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha

Live · updated continuously

MenuGPT-5.4 Pro (xhigh) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha

Find

Find a model Comparison table Score overview

Browse

Models Benchmarks Sources Compare

Method

Data status Data & sources Scoring method Methodology Changelog

Model vs model

GPT-5.4 Pro (xhigh) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha

A debate-ready pair page: current winner, strongest alternative, decisive benchmarks, and the warning that should travel with the claim.

Use case · Everyday chatbot
Winner · GPT-5.4 Pro (xhigh)
Sources · All public sources

Winner

GPT-5.4 Pro (xhigh)

OpenAI

0benchmarks won

Reasoning / math / science
Chat / text

Versus · Everyday chatbot

GPT-5.4 Pro (xhigh) leads this compare set for everyday chatbot.

GPT-5.4 Pro (xhigh)0 of 0 wins

Thin verified coverage

0 shared benchmarks are still too close to call, so the win stays conditional. This compare uses all public sources, with provider-official evidence labeled separately.

Close calls: 0
Sources: All public

Full compare workspace Disagreement page

0%win share

UAB

Versus

Live · updated continuously

MenuVersus

Find

Find a model Comparison table Score overview

Browse

Models Benchmarks Sources Compare

Method

Data status Data & sources Scoring method Methodology Changelog

Head-to-head

Loading model comparison.

Preparing shared benchmarks, gaps, and confidence notes.

The cases in full

GPT-5.4 Pro (xhigh) case

Reasoning / math / science
Chat / text

Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha case

Reasoning / math / science

What changes the outcome

GPT-5.4 Pro (xhigh): 134 visible benchmark gaps still leave room for the result to move.
Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha: 121 visible benchmark gaps still leave room for the result to move.

Why this result is surprising

The visible shared evidence is more decisive than usual for this compare set.
Very few shared benchmarks are decisively separating these models.

Why this is not a clean win

0 shared benchmarks are still too close to call, so the win stays conditional. This compare uses all public sources, with provider-official evidence labeled separately.
Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha remains the strongest alternative once you change use case, mode, or missing-evidence assumptions.

Open full compare workspace Open evidence page Open disagreement page

Advanced framings and X composerNeutral, contrarian, open-model, and skeptical variants

Neutral analystLead with the recommendation, then attach the reason and warning.GPT-5.4 Pro (xhigh) leads this compare set for everyday chatbot.

ContrarianPush against the easy read and keep the strongest alternative live.Contrarian take: GPT-5.4 Pro (xhigh) leads this compare set for everyday chatbot.

Open-model angleBias the framing toward open weights and source transparency.Open-model angle: Model compare · GPT-5.4 Pro (xhigh) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha

Don't trust the headlineLead with the warning before you let the claim travel.Don't trust the headline: Model compare · GPT-5.4 Pro (xhigh) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha

4 of 138 benchmarks


Blended price AA · /1M tokens Text · Chat / text	$67.5 /1M tokensn/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value $67.5 /1M tokens Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility benchmark_derived_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label GPT-5.4 Pro (xhigh) Source row	$0.6 /1M tokensn/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value $0.6 /1M tokens Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility preview_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha Source row	n/a
Input price AA · /1M input tokens Text · Chat / text	$30 /1M input tokensn/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value $30 /1M input tokens Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility benchmark_derived_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label GPT-5.4 Pro (xhigh) Source row	$0.5 /1M input tokensn/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value $0.5 /1M input tokens Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility preview_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha Source row	n/a
Output price AA · /1M output tokens Text · Chat / text	$180 /1M output tokensn/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value $180 /1M output tokens Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility benchmark_derived_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label GPT-5.4 Pro (xhigh) Source row	$0.9 /1M output tokensn/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value $0.9 /1M output tokens Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility preview_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha Source row	n/a
CritPt AA · % Text · Reasoning / math / science	30%n/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value 30% Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility benchmark_derived_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label GPT-5.4 Pro (xhigh) Source row	10.9%n/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value 10.9% Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility preview_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha Source row	n/a

1-4 of 4

Page 1 of 1Page size

GPT-5.4 Pro (xhigh) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha

GPT-5.4 Pro (xhigh)

GPT-5.4 Pro (xhigh) leads this compare set for everyday chatbot.

Loading model comparison.

GPT-5.4 Pro (xhigh) vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha

GPT-5.4 Pro (xhigh)

GPT-5.4 Pro (xhigh) leads this compare set for everyday chatbot.

Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha

GPT-5.4 Pro (xhigh) case

Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha case

What changes the outcome

Why this result is surprising

Why this is not a clean win

Share the recommendation with the source data attached.

Open or copy the stable surfaces

Use the exact public framing

Pick the voice before you post

Compose a post that keeps the warning attached

Decisive benchmarks