Model vs model

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha

A debate-ready pair page: current winner, strongest alternative, decisive benchmarks, and the warning that should travel with the claim.

Use case · Everyday chatbot
Winner · Gemma 4 26B A4B
Sources · All public sources

Winner

Gemma 4 26B A4B

Google

17benchmarks won

Reasoning / math / science
Professional reasoning

Versus · Everyday chatbot

Gemma 4 26B A4B leads this compare set for everyday chatbot.

Gemma 4 26B A4B17 of 17 wins

Verified and stable

0 shared benchmarks are still too close to call, so the win stays conditional. This compare uses all public sources, with provider-official evidence labeled separately.

Close calls: 0
Sources: All public

Full compare workspace Disagreement page

100%win share

Challenger

Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha

Unknown

0benchmarks won

Reasoning / math / science

The cases in full

Gemma 4 26B A4B case

Reasoning / math / science
Professional reasoning

Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha case

Reasoning / math / science

What changes the outcome

Gemma 4 26B A4B: 112 visible benchmark gaps still leave room for the result to move.
Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha: 121 visible benchmark gaps still leave room for the result to move.

Why this result is surprising

The visible shared evidence is more decisive than usual for this compare set.
Very few shared benchmarks are decisively separating these models.

Why this is not a clean win

0 shared benchmarks are still too close to call, so the win stays conditional. This compare uses all public sources, with provider-official evidence labeled separately.
Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha remains the strongest alternative once you change use case, mode, or missing-evidence assumptions.

Open full compare workspace Open evidence page Open disagreement page

Advanced framings and X composerNeutral, contrarian, open-model, and skeptical variants

Neutral analystLead with the recommendation, then attach the reason and warning.Gemma 4 26B A4B leads this compare set for everyday chatbot.

ContrarianPush against the easy read and keep the strongest alternative live.Contrarian take: Gemma 4 26B A4B leads this compare set for everyday chatbot.

Open-model angleBias the framing toward open weights and source transparency.Open-model angle: Model compare · Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha

Don't trust the headlineLead with the warning before you let the claim travel.Don't trust the headline: Model compare · Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha

Decisive benchmarks

17 of 138 benchmarks


Intelligence Index AA · index Text · Chat / text	2065.4% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 20 Percentile 65.4% Last updated recent Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) Source row	40n/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value 40 Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility preview_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha Source row	n/a
Time to first token AA · s Text · Chat / text	1.07s82.1% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 1.07s Percentile 82.1% Last updated recent Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) Source row	2.09sn/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value 2.09s Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility preview_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha Source row	n/a
Coding Index AA · index Code · Coding	3955.3% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 39 Percentile 55.3% Last updated recent Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) Source row	59n/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value 59 Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility preview_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha Source row	n/a
Agentic Index AA · index Code · Coding	1133.8% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 11 Percentile 33.8% Last updated recent Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) Source row	25n/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value 25 Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility preview_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha Source row	n/a
Output Speed AA · tokens/s Text · Chat / text	74.6 tokens/s41.5% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 74.6 tokens/s Percentile 41.5% Last updated recent Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) Source row	132 tokens/sn/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value 132 tokens/s Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility preview_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha Source row	n/a
Time to first answer token AA · s Text · Chat / text	1.07s87.5% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 1.07s Percentile 87.5% Last updated recent Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) Source row	17.24sn/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value 17.24s Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility preview_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha Source row	n/a
Blended price AA · /1M tokens Text · Chat / text	$0.2 /1M tokens78.4% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value $0.2 /1M tokens Percentile 78.4% Last updated recent Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) Source row	$0.6 /1M tokensn/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value $0.6 /1M tokens Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility preview_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha Source row	n/a
Input price AA · /1M input tokens Text · Chat / text	$0.1 /1M input tokens79.1% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value $0.1 /1M input tokens Percentile 79.1% Last updated recent Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) Source row	$0.5 /1M input tokensn/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value $0.5 /1M input tokens Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility preview_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha Source row	n/a
Output price AA · /1M output tokens Text · Chat / text	$0.4 /1M output tokens78.4% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value $0.4 /1M output tokens Percentile 78.4% Last updated recent Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) Source row	$0.9 /1M output tokensn/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value $0.9 /1M output tokens Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility preview_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha Source row	n/a
GPQA AA · % Text · Reasoning / math / science	71.4%60.8% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 71.4% Percentile 60.8% Last updated recent Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) Source row	87.6%n/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value 87.6% Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility preview_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha Source row	n/a
Humanity's Last Exam AA · % Text · Reasoning / math / science	11.5%71% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 11.5% Percentile 71% Last updated recent Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) Source row	33.6%n/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value 33.6% Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility preview_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha Source row	n/a
CritPt AA · % Text · Reasoning / math / science	0%60.3% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 0% Percentile 60.3% Last updated recent Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) Source row	10.9%n/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value 10.9% Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility preview_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha Source row	n/a

1-12 of 17

Page 1 of 2Page size

Intelligence Index

AA · index

Text · Chat / text

2065.4%

exact aliasverified runtime

Row details

Raw value: 20
Percentile: 65.4%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: provider alias (0.94)
Source label: Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning)

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha

Gemma 4 26B A4B

Gemma 4 26B A4B leads this compare set for everyday chatbot.

Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha

Gemma 4 26B A4B case

Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha case

What changes the outcome

Why this result is surprising

Why this is not a clean win

Share the recommendation with the source data attached.

Open or copy the stable surfaces

Use the exact public framing

Pick the voice before you post

Compose a post that keeps the warning attached

Decisive benchmarks

Loading model comparison.

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha

Gemma 4 26B A4B

Gemma 4 26B A4B leads this compare set for everyday chatbot.

Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha

Gemma 4 26B A4B case

Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha case

What changes the outcome

Why this result is surprising

Why this is not a clean win

Share the recommendation with the source data attached.

Open or copy the stable surfaces

Use the exact public framing

Pick the voice before you post

Compose a post that keeps the warning attached

Decisive benchmarks