Model vs model

DeepSeek Reasoner vs A.X-K2

A debate-ready pair page: current winner, strongest alternative, decisive benchmarks, and the warning that should travel with the claim.

Use case · Everyday chatbot
Winner · DeepSeek Reasoner
Sources · All public sources

Winner

DeepSeek Reasoner

DeepSeek

8benchmarks won

Chat / text
Reasoning / math / science

Versus · Everyday chatbot

DeepSeek Reasoner leads this compare set for everyday chatbot.

DeepSeek Reasoner8 of 8 wins

Verified and stable

0 shared benchmarks are still too close to call, so the win stays conditional. This compare uses all public sources, with provider-official evidence labeled separately.

Close calls: 0
Sources: All public

Full compare workspace Disagreement page

100%win share

Challenger

A.X-K2

Unknown

0benchmarks won

Chat / text
Reasoning / math / science

The cases in full

DeepSeek Reasoner case

Chat / text
Reasoning / math / science

A.X-K2 case

Chat / text
Reasoning / math / science

What changes the outcome

DeepSeek Reasoner: 113 visible benchmark gaps still leave room for the result to move.
A.X-K2: 124 visible benchmark gaps still leave room for the result to move.

Why this result is surprising

The visible shared evidence is more decisive than usual for this compare set.
Very few shared benchmarks are decisively separating these models.

Why this is not a clean win

0 shared benchmarks are still too close to call, so the win stays conditional. This compare uses all public sources, with provider-official evidence labeled separately.
A.X-K2 remains the strongest alternative once you change use case, mode, or missing-evidence assumptions.

Open full compare workspace Open evidence page Open disagreement page

Decisive benchmarks

8 of 132 benchmarks


Intelligence Index AA · index Text · Chat / text	1151.9% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 11 Percentile 51.9% Last updated recent Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) Source row	23n/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value 23 Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility benchmark_derived_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label A.X-K2 Source row	n/a
GPQA AA · % Text · Reasoning / math / science	70.8%55.6% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 70.8% Percentile 55.6% Last updated recent Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) Source row	85.7%n/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value 85.7% Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility benchmark_derived_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label A.X-K2 Source row	n/a
Humanity's Last Exam AA · % Text · Reasoning / math / science	8.5%51.2% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 8.5% Percentile 51.2% Last updated recent Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) Source row	29.6%n/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value 29.6% Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility benchmark_derived_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label A.X-K2 Source row	n/a
CritPt AA · % Text · Reasoning / math / science	0.6%62.8% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 0.6% Percentile 62.8% Last updated recent Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) Source row	8.9%n/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value 8.9% Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility benchmark_derived_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label A.X-K2 Source row	n/a
SciCode AA · % Code · Coding	38.3%22.2% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 38.3% Percentile 22.2% Last updated recent Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) Source row	41%n/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value 41% Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility benchmark_derived_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label A.X-K2 Source row	n/a
AA-Omniscience accuracy AA · % Text · Chat / text	30.5%73.3% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 30.5% Percentile 73.3% Last updated recent Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) Source row	18.6%n/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value 18.6% Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility benchmark_derived_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label A.X-K2 Source row	n/a
AA-Omniscience non-hallucination AA · % Text · Chat / text	9.7%26% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 9.7% Percentile 26% Last updated recent Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) Source row	67%n/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value 67% Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility benchmark_derived_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label A.X-K2 Source row	n/a
Long Context Reasoning AA · % Document · Long context	57.7%54.9% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 57.7% Percentile 54.9% Last updated recent Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) Source row	70%n/a exact aliasverified runtimeContext only Row details Raw value 70% Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility benchmark_derived_model Identity provider alias (0.94) Source label A.X-K2 Source row	n/a

1-8 of 8

Page 1 of 1Page size

Intelligence Index

AA · index

Text · Chat / text

1151.9%

exact aliasverified runtime

Row details

Raw value: 11
Percentile: 51.9%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: provider alias (0.94)
Source label: DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)

Source row

23n/a

exact aliasverified runtimeContext only

Row details

Raw value: 23
Percentile: n/a
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: benchmark_derived_model
Identity: provider alias (0.94)
Source label: A.X-K2

Source row

n/a

GPQA

AA · %

Text · Reasoning / math / science

70.8%55.6%

exact aliasverified runtime

Row details

Raw value: 70.8%
Percentile: 55.6%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: provider alias (0.94)
Source label: DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)

Source row

85.7%n/a

exact aliasverified runtimeContext only

Row details

Raw value: 85.7%
Percentile: n/a
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: benchmark_derived_model
Identity: provider alias (0.94)
Source label: A.X-K2

Source row

n/a

Humanity's Last Exam

AA · %

Text · Reasoning / math / science

8.5%51.2%

exact aliasverified runtime

Row details

Raw value: 8.5%
Percentile: 51.2%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: provider alias (0.94)
Source label: DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)

Source row

29.6%n/a

exact aliasverified runtimeContext only

Row details

Raw value: 29.6%
Percentile: n/a
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: benchmark_derived_model
Identity: provider alias (0.94)
Source label: A.X-K2

Source row

n/a

CritPt

AA · %

Text · Reasoning / math / science

0.6%62.8%

exact aliasverified runtime

Row details

Raw value: 0.6%
Percentile: 62.8%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: provider alias (0.94)
Source label: DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)

Source row

8.9%n/a

exact aliasverified runtimeContext only

Row details

Raw value: 8.9%
Percentile: n/a
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: benchmark_derived_model
Identity: provider alias (0.94)
Source label: A.X-K2

Source row

n/a

SciCode

AA · %

Code · Coding

38.3%22.2%

exact aliasverified runtime

Row details

Raw value: 38.3%
Percentile: 22.2%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: provider alias (0.94)
Source label: DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)

Source row

41%n/a

exact aliasverified runtimeContext only

Row details

Raw value: 41%
Percentile: n/a
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: benchmark_derived_model
Identity: provider alias (0.94)
Source label: A.X-K2

Source row

n/a

AA-Omniscience accuracy

AA · %

Text · Chat / text

30.5%73.3%

exact aliasverified runtime

Row details

Raw value: 30.5%
Percentile: 73.3%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: provider alias (0.94)
Source label: DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)

Source row

18.6%n/a

exact aliasverified runtimeContext only

Row details

Raw value: 18.6%
Percentile: n/a
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: benchmark_derived_model
Identity: provider alias (0.94)
Source label: A.X-K2

Source row

n/a

AA-Omniscience non-hallucination

AA · %

Text · Chat / text

9.7%26%

exact aliasverified runtime

Row details

Raw value: 9.7%
Percentile: 26%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: provider alias (0.94)
Source label: DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)

Source row

67%n/a

exact aliasverified runtimeContext only

Row details

Raw value: 67%
Percentile: n/a
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: benchmark_derived_model
Identity: provider alias (0.94)
Source label: A.X-K2

Source row

n/a

Long Context Reasoning

AA · %

Document · Long context

57.7%54.9%

exact aliasverified runtime

Row details

Raw value: 57.7%
Percentile: 54.9%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: provider alias (0.94)
Source label: DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)

Source row

70%n/a

exact aliasverified runtimeContext only

Row details

Raw value: 70%
Percentile: n/a
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: benchmark_derived_model
Identity: provider alias (0.94)
Source label: A.X-K2

Source row

n/a

DeepSeek Reasoner vs A.X-K2

DeepSeek Reasoner

DeepSeek Reasoner leads this compare set for everyday chatbot.

A.X-K2

DeepSeek Reasoner case

A.X-K2 case

What changes the outcome

Why this result is surprising

Why this is not a clean win

Share the recommendation with the source data attached.

Open or copy the stable surfaces

Use the exact public framing

Pick the voice before you post

Compose a post that keeps the warning attached

Decisive benchmarks

Loading model comparison.

DeepSeek Reasoner vs A.X-K2

DeepSeek Reasoner

DeepSeek Reasoner leads this compare set for everyday chatbot.

A.X-K2

DeepSeek Reasoner case

A.X-K2 case

What changes the outcome

Why this result is surprising

Why this is not a clean win

Share the recommendation with the source data attached.

Open or copy the stable surfaces

Use the exact public framing

Pick the voice before you post

Compose a post that keeps the warning attached

Decisive benchmarks