Model vs model

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

A debate-ready pair page: current winner, strongest alternative, decisive benchmarks, and the warning that should travel with the claim.

Use case · Coding copilot
Winner · Claude Opus 4.7
Sources · All public sources

Winner

Claude Opus 4.7

Anthropic

7benchmarks won

Professional reasoning
Coding

Versus · Coding copilot

Claude Opus 4.7 leads this compare set for coding copilot.

Claude Opus 4.77 of 9 wins

Verified and stable

2 shared benchmarks are still too close to call, so the win stays conditional. This compare uses all public sources, with provider-official evidence labeled separately.

Close calls: 2
Sources: All public

Full compare workspace Disagreement page

78%win share

Challenger

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Google

2benchmarks won

Long context
Search / tool use

The cases in full

Claude Opus 4.7 case

Professional reasoning
Coding

Gemini 3.1 Pro case

Long context
Search / tool use

What changes the outcome

Claude Opus 4.7: 67 visible benchmark gaps still leave room for the result to move.
Gemini 3.1 Pro: 120 visible benchmark gaps still leave room for the result to move.

Why this result is surprising

2 shared benchmarks are still close, so the winner is narrower than it looks.
BrowseComp is doing a lot of the visible work in the public narrative.

Why this is not a clean win

2 shared benchmarks are still too close to call, so the win stays conditional. This compare uses all public sources, with provider-official evidence labeled separately.
Gemini 3.1 Pro remains the strongest alternative once you change use case, mode, or missing-evidence assumptions.

Open full compare workspace Open evidence page Open disagreement page

Decisive benchmarks

bench

BrowseComp

Gemini 3.1 Pro has the cleanest edge here.

bench

SWE-Bench Verified

Claude Opus 4.7 has the cleanest edge here.

bench

Overall quality

Claude Opus 4.7 has the cleanest edge here.

10 of 132 benchmarks


BrowseComp OFF · % Search · Search / tool use	79.3%33.3% Officialmanual verifiedmanual verified Row details Raw value 79.3% Percentile 33.3% Last updated archived Eligibility headline eligible Identity exact (1.00) Source label claude-opus-4-7 Source row	85.9%100% Officialmanual verifiedmanual verified Row details Raw value 85.9% Percentile 100% Last updated archived Eligibility headline eligible Identity exact (1.00) Source label gemini-3-1-pro Source row	66.7% spread
SWE-Bench Verified OFF · % Code · Coding	87.6%100% Officialmanual verifiedmanual verified Row details Raw value 87.6% Percentile 100% Last updated archived Eligibility headline eligible Identity exact (1.00) Source label claude-opus-4-7 Source row	80.6%60% Officialmanual verifiedmanual verified Row details Raw value 80.6% Percentile 60% Last updated archived Eligibility headline eligible Identity exact (1.00) Source label gemini-3-1-pro Source row	40% spread
Overall quality BB · % Code · Coding	89.7%86.4% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 89.7% Percentile 86.4% Last updated archived Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.92) Source label Claude Opus 4.7 Source row	76.2%50% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 76.2% Percentile 50% Last updated archived Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.92) Source label Gemini 3.1 Pro Source row	36.4% spread
Overall vibe BB · % Code · Coding	83.8%81.8% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 83.8% Percentile 81.8% Last updated archived Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.92) Source label Claude Opus 4.7 Source row	72.6%50% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 72.6% Percentile 50% Last updated archived Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.92) Source label Gemini 3.1 Pro Source row	31.8% spread
HiL-Bench SL · % Code · Coding	41.7%75% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 41.7% Percentile 75% Last updated recent Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.92) Source label Claude Opus 4.7 Source row	35.3%50% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 35.3% Percentile 50% Last updated recent Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.92) Source label Gemini 3.1 Pro Source row	25% spread
Terminal-Bench 2.0 OFF · % Code · Coding	69.4%66.7% Officialmanual verifiedmanual verified Row details Raw value 69.4% Percentile 66.7% Last updated archived Eligibility headline eligible Identity exact (1.00) Source label claude-opus-4-7 Source row	68.5%50% Officialmanual verifiedmanual verified Row details Raw value 68.5% Percentile 50% Last updated archived Eligibility headline eligible Identity exact (1.00) Source label gemini-3-1-pro Source row	16.7% spread
Humanity's Last Exam OFF · % Text · Reasoning / math / science	46.9%100% Officialmanual verifiedmanual verified Row details Raw value 46.9% Percentile 100% Last updated archived Eligibility headline eligible Identity exact (1.00) Source label claude-opus-4-7 Source row	44.4%85.7% Officialmanual verifiedmanual verified Row details Raw value 44.4% Percentile 85.7% Last updated archived Eligibility headline eligible Identity exact (1.00) Source label gemini-3-1-pro Source row	14.3% spread
Search Arena AR · rating Search · Search / tool use	1,21287.9% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 1,212 Percentile 87.9% Last updated recent Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.92) Source label claude-opus-4-7 Source row	1,20884.8% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 1,208 Percentile 84.8% Last updated recent Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.92) Source label gemini-3.1-pro-grounding Source row	3% spread
Overall coverage BB · % Code · Coding	100%100% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 100% Percentile 100% Last updated archived Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.92) Source label Claude Opus 4.7 Source row	100%100% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 100% Percentile 100% Last updated archived Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.92) Source label Gemini 3.1 Pro Source row	effectively tied
PRBench Legal SL · % Text · Professional reasoning	34%n/a proxy backfilledbackfilledContext only Row details Raw value 34% Percentile n/a Last updated recent Eligibility Fallback benchmark identity is visible for context but excluded from default ranking. Identity benchmark proxy (0.58) Source label claude-opus-4-1-20250805 Source row	44%51.2% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 44% Percentile 51.2% Last updated recent Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.92) Source label gemini-3.1-pro Source row	n/a

1-10 of 10

Page 1 of 1Page size

BrowseComp

OFF · %

Search · Search / tool use

79.3%33.3%

Officialmanual verifiedmanual verified

Row details

Raw value: 79.3%
Percentile: 33.3%
Last updated: archived
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: exact (1.00)
Source label: claude-opus-4-7

Source row

85.9%100%

Officialmanual verifiedmanual verified

Row details

Raw value: 85.9%
Percentile: 100%
Last updated: archived
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: exact (1.00)
Source label: gemini-3-1-pro

Source row

66.7% spread

SWE-Bench Verified

OFF · %

Code · Coding

87.6%100%

Officialmanual verifiedmanual verified

Row details

Raw value: 87.6%
Percentile: 100%
Last updated: archived
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: exact (1.00)
Source label: claude-opus-4-7

Source row

80.6%60%

Officialmanual verifiedmanual verified

Row details

Raw value: 80.6%
Percentile: 60%
Last updated: archived
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: exact (1.00)
Source label: gemini-3-1-pro

Source row

40% spread

Overall quality

BB · %

Code · Coding

89.7%86.4%

exact aliasverified runtime

Row details

Raw value: 89.7%
Percentile: 86.4%
Last updated: archived
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: provider alias (0.92)
Source label: Claude Opus 4.7

Source row

76.2%50%

exact aliasverified runtime

Row details

Raw value: 76.2%
Percentile: 50%
Last updated: archived
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: provider alias (0.92)
Source label: Gemini 3.1 Pro

Source row

36.4% spread

Overall vibe

BB · %

Code · Coding

83.8%81.8%

exact aliasverified runtime

Row details

Raw value: 83.8%
Percentile: 81.8%
Last updated: archived
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: provider alias (0.92)
Source label: Claude Opus 4.7

Source row

72.6%50%

exact aliasverified runtime

Row details

Raw value: 72.6%
Percentile: 50%
Last updated: archived
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: provider alias (0.92)
Source label: Gemini 3.1 Pro

Source row

31.8% spread

HiL-Bench

SL · %

Code · Coding

41.7%75%

exact aliasverified runtime

Row details

Raw value: 41.7%
Percentile: 75%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: provider alias (0.92)
Source label: Claude Opus 4.7

Source row

35.3%50%

exact aliasverified runtime

Row details

Raw value: 35.3%
Percentile: 50%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: provider alias (0.92)
Source label: Gemini 3.1 Pro

Source row

25% spread

Terminal-Bench 2.0

OFF · %

Code · Coding

69.4%66.7%

Officialmanual verifiedmanual verified

Row details

Raw value: 69.4%
Percentile: 66.7%
Last updated: archived
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: exact (1.00)
Source label: claude-opus-4-7

Source row

68.5%50%

Officialmanual verifiedmanual verified

Row details

Raw value: 68.5%
Percentile: 50%
Last updated: archived
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: exact (1.00)
Source label: gemini-3-1-pro

Source row

16.7% spread

Humanity's Last Exam

OFF · %

Text · Reasoning / math / science

46.9%100%

Officialmanual verifiedmanual verified

Row details

Raw value: 46.9%
Percentile: 100%
Last updated: archived
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: exact (1.00)
Source label: claude-opus-4-7

Source row

44.4%85.7%

Officialmanual verifiedmanual verified

Row details

Raw value: 44.4%
Percentile: 85.7%
Last updated: archived
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: exact (1.00)
Source label: gemini-3-1-pro

Source row

14.3% spread

Search Arena

AR · rating

Search · Search / tool use

1,21287.9%

exact aliasverified runtime

Row details

Raw value: 1,212
Percentile: 87.9%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: provider alias (0.92)
Source label: claude-opus-4-7

Source row

1,20884.8%

exact aliasverified runtime

Row details

Raw value: 1,208
Percentile: 84.8%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: provider alias (0.92)
Source label: gemini-3.1-pro-grounding

Source row

3% spread

Overall coverage

BB · %

Code · Coding

100%100%

exact aliasverified runtime

Row details

Raw value: 100%
Percentile: 100%
Last updated: archived
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: provider alias (0.92)
Source label: Claude Opus 4.7

Source row

100%100%

exact aliasverified runtime

Row details

Raw value: 100%
Percentile: 100%
Last updated: archived
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: provider alias (0.92)
Source label: Gemini 3.1 Pro

Source row

effectively tied

PRBench Legal

SL · %

Text · Professional reasoning

34%n/a

proxy backfilledbackfilledContext only

Row details

Raw value: 34%
Percentile: n/a
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: Fallback benchmark identity is visible for context but excluded from default ranking.
Identity: benchmark proxy (0.58)
Source label: claude-opus-4-1-20250805

Source row

44%51.2%

exact aliasverified runtime

Row details

Raw value: 44%
Percentile: 51.2%
Last updated: recent
Eligibility: headline eligible
Identity: provider alias (0.92)
Source label: gemini-3.1-pro

Source row

n/a

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Claude Opus 4.7

Claude Opus 4.7 leads this compare set for coding copilot.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Claude Opus 4.7 case

Gemini 3.1 Pro case

What changes the outcome

Why this result is surprising

Why this is not a clean win

Share the recommendation with the source data attached.

Open or copy the stable surfaces

Use the exact public framing

Pick the voice before you post

Compose a post that keeps the warning attached

Decisive benchmarks

Loading model comparison.

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Claude Opus 4.7

Claude Opus 4.7 leads this compare set for coding copilot.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Claude Opus 4.7 case

Gemini 3.1 Pro case

What changes the outcome

Why this result is surprising

Why this is not a clean win

Share the recommendation with the source data attached.

Open or copy the stable surfaces

Use the exact public framing

Pick the voice before you post

Compose a post that keeps the warning attached

Decisive benchmarks