Model vs model

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

A debate-ready pair page: current winner, strongest alternative, decisive benchmarks, and the warning that should travel with the claim.

Use case · Coding copilot
Winner · Claude Opus 4.7
Sources · All public sources

Winner

Claude Opus 4.7

Anthropic

7benchmarks won

Professional reasoning

Versus · Coding copilot

Claude Opus 4.7 leads this compare set for coding copilot.

Claude Opus 4.77 of 8 wins

Verified but aging

2 shared benchmarks are still too close to call, so the win stays conditional. This compare uses all public sources, with provider-official evidence labeled separately.

Close calls: 2
Sources: All public

Full compare workspace Disagreement page

88%win share

Challenger

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Google

1benchmarks won

Reasoning / math / science
Long context

The cases in full

Claude Opus 4.7 case

Professional reasoning

Gemini 3.1 Pro case

Reasoning / math / science
Long context

What changes the outcome

Claude Opus 4.7: 68 visible benchmark gaps still leave room for the result to move.
Gemini 3.1 Pro: 122 visible benchmark gaps still leave room for the result to move.

Why this result is surprising

2 shared benchmarks are still close, so the winner is narrower than it looks.
BrowseComp is doing a lot of the visible work in the public narrative.

Why this is not a clean win

2 shared benchmarks are still too close to call, so the win stays conditional. This compare uses all public sources, with provider-official evidence labeled separately.
Gemini 3.1 Pro remains the strongest alternative once you change use case, mode, or missing-evidence assumptions.

Open full compare workspace Open evidence page Open disagreement page

Decisive benchmarks

bench

BrowseComp

Gemini 3.1 Pro has the cleanest edge here.

bench

HiL-Bench

Claude Opus 4.7 has the cleanest edge here.

bench

SWE-Bench Verified

Claude Opus 4.7 has the cleanest edge here.

9 of 138 benchmarks


BrowseComp OFF · % Search · Search / tool use	79.3%33.3% Officialmanual verifiedmanual verified Row details Raw value 79.3% Percentile 33.3% Last updated stale Eligibility headline eligible Identity exact (1.00) Source label claude-opus-4-7 Source row	85.9%100% Officialmanual verifiedmanual verified Row details Raw value 85.9% Percentile 100% Last updated stale Eligibility headline eligible Identity exact (1.00) Source label gemini-3-1-pro Source row	66.7% spread
HiL-Bench SL · % Code · Coding	27.7%80% exact directverified runtime Row details Raw value 27.7% Percentile 80% Last updated stale Eligibility headline eligible Identity exact (1.00) Source label claude-opus-4-7 Source row	20.3%40% exact directverified runtime Row details Raw value 20.3% Percentile 40% Last updated stale Eligibility headline eligible Identity exact (1.00) Source label gemini-3-1-pro Source row	40% spread
SWE-Bench Verified OFF · % Code · Coding	87.6%100% Officialmanual verifiedmanual verified Row details Raw value 87.6% Percentile 100% Last updated stale Eligibility headline eligible Identity exact (1.00) Source label claude-opus-4-7 Source row	80.6%60% Officialmanual verifiedmanual verified Row details Raw value 80.6% Percentile 60% Last updated stale Eligibility headline eligible Identity exact (1.00) Source label gemini-3-1-pro Source row	40% spread
Overall quality BB · % Code · Coding	89.7%86.4% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 89.7% Percentile 86.4% Last updated archived Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.92) Source label Claude Opus 4.7 Source row	76.2%50% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 76.2% Percentile 50% Last updated archived Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.92) Source label Gemini 3.1 Pro Source row	36.4% spread
Overall vibe BB · % Code · Coding	83.8%81.8% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 83.8% Percentile 81.8% Last updated archived Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.92) Source label Claude Opus 4.7 Source row	72.6%50% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 72.6% Percentile 50% Last updated archived Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.92) Source label Gemini 3.1 Pro Source row	31.8% spread
Terminal-Bench 2.0 OFF · % Code · Coding	69.4%66.7% Officialmanual verifiedmanual verified Row details Raw value 69.4% Percentile 66.7% Last updated stale Eligibility headline eligible Identity exact (1.00) Source label claude-opus-4-7 Source row	68.5%50% Officialmanual verifiedmanual verified Row details Raw value 68.5% Percentile 50% Last updated stale Eligibility headline eligible Identity exact (1.00) Source label gemini-3-1-pro Source row	16.7% spread
Humanity's Last Exam OFF · % Text · Reasoning / math / science	46.9%100% Officialmanual verifiedmanual verified Row details Raw value 46.9% Percentile 100% Last updated stale Eligibility headline eligible Identity exact (1.00) Source label claude-opus-4-7 Source row	44.4%85.7% Officialmanual verifiedmanual verified Row details Raw value 44.4% Percentile 85.7% Last updated stale Eligibility headline eligible Identity exact (1.00) Source label gemini-3-1-pro Source row	14.3% spread
Search Arena AR · rating Search · Search / tool use	1,21190% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 1,211 Percentile 90% Last updated aging Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.92) Source label claude-opus-4-7 Source row	1,21086.7% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 1,210 Percentile 86.7% Last updated aging Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.92) Source label gemini-3.1-pro-grounding Source row	3.3% spread
Overall coverage BB · % Code · Coding	100%100% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 100% Percentile 100% Last updated archived Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.92) Source label Claude Opus 4.7 Source row	100%100% exact aliasverified runtime Row details Raw value 100% Percentile 100% Last updated archived Eligibility headline eligible Identity provider alias (0.92) Source label Gemini 3.1 Pro Source row	effectively tied

1-9 of 9

Page 1 of 1Page size

Loading model comparison.

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Claude Opus 4.7

Claude Opus 4.7 leads this compare set for coding copilot.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Claude Opus 4.7 case

Gemini 3.1 Pro case

What changes the outcome

Why this result is surprising

Why this is not a clean win

Share the recommendation with the source data attached.

Open or copy the stable surfaces

Use the exact public framing

Pick the voice before you post

Compose a post that keeps the warning attached

Decisive benchmarks