UAB
Home/Compare
Compare
Live · updated continuously
Compare · pick a model

Compare the models people actually argue about.

Use shared tests, visible gaps, and close-call warnings before turning a benchmark lead into a public claim.
Selected models · 1
Shared benchmarks · 53
Current leader · Gemini 2.5 Pro
Compare controls

Keep the recommendation honest.

Use case and source filter stay visible up top. Edits, saves, follows, and links stay available without running the page.

Current frameBest for this use caseCoding copilot · All public sources
What should win?
Preset

Keep the same models, change the use case, and recompute the recommendation without resetting the page.

Sources
Models to compare

Keep the compare set tight. Add one model at a time, then prune aggressively.

1 / 6 models
Workspace utilities

Save, follow, or copy this exact setup only after the comparison looks right.

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Save or share this workspacefollow it, copy it, or reopen it later
Open reportOpen workspaces
Compare · Coding copilot · best for this use case

Gemini 2.5 Pro leads this compare set for coding copilot.

Gemini 2.5 Prono clear runner-up
Verified and stable

The current evidence supports a shortlist, not a single winner.

Shared tests
53
Close calls
0
Sources
All public
Open evidence pageInspect disagreement
Decision detail

Read this page as a workspace for choosing between top models, not as a universal crown. The current frame is Coding copilot under best for this use case.

Why the leader is ahead
Document understanding · Vision understanding
Where the evidence is thin
0 close-call benchmarks and 61 missing missing leader rows keep this from reading as settled.
What to do next
Inspect decisive benchmarks first, then open the disagreement page or head-to-head pages if the top line still feels too narrow.
Open evidence pageInspect benchmark disagreement
53 of 114 benchmarks
Text Arena
AR · rating
Text · Chat / text
1,44687.7%
exact aliasverified runtime
Row details
Raw value
1,446
Percentile
87.7%
Last updated
recent
Eligibility
headline eligible
Identity
provider alias (0.92)
Source label
gemini-2.5-pro
Source row
n/a
Code Arena
AR · rating
Code · Coding
1,2048.2%
exact aliasverified runtime
Row details
Raw value
1,204
Percentile
8.2%
Last updated
recent
Eligibility
headline eligible
Identity
provider alias (0.92)
Source label
gemini-2.5-pro
Source row
n/a
Vision Arena
AR · rating
Vision · Vision understanding
1,24678.9%
exact aliasverified runtime
Row details
Raw value
1,246
Percentile
78.9%
Last updated
recent
Eligibility
headline eligible
Identity
provider alias (0.92)
Source label
gemini-2.5-pro
Source row
n/a
WebDev Arena
AR · rating
Code · Coding
1,2048.2%
exact aliasverified runtime
Row details
Raw value
1,204
Percentile
8.2%
Last updated
recent
Eligibility
headline eligible
Identity
provider alias (0.92)
Source label
gemini-2.5-pro
Source row
n/a
Search Arena
AR · rating
Search · Search / tool use
1,14216.7%
exact aliasverified runtime
Row details
Raw value
1,142
Percentile
16.7%
Last updated
recent
Eligibility
headline eligible
Identity
provider alias (0.92)
Source label
gemini-2.5-pro-grounding
Source row
n/a
Document Arena
AR · rating
Document · Document understanding
1,43016.7%
exact aliasverified runtime
Row details
Raw value
1,430
Percentile
16.7%
Last updated
recent
Eligibility
headline eligible
Identity
provider alias (0.92)
Source label
gemini-2.5-pro
Source row
n/a
Intelligence Index
AA · index
Text · Chat / text
2274.4%
exact aliasverified runtime
Row details
Raw value
22
Percentile
74.4%
Last updated
recent
Eligibility
headline eligible
Identity
provider alias (0.94)
Source label
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (May' 25)
Source row
n/a
Time to first token
AA · s
Text · Chat / text
19.34s11%
exact aliasverified runtime
Row details
Raw value
19.34s
Percentile
11%
Last updated
recent
Eligibility
headline eligible
Identity
provider alias (0.94)
Source label
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Source row
n/a
Openness Index
AA · index
Text · Chat / text
67.5%
exact aliasverified runtime
Row details
Raw value
6
Percentile
7.5%
Last updated
recent
Eligibility
headline eligible
Identity
provider alias (0.94)
Source label
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Source row
n/a
Output Speed
AA · tokens/s
Text · Chat / text
133.9 tokens/s69%
exact aliasverified runtime
Row details
Raw value
133.9 tokens/s
Percentile
69%
Last updated
recent
Eligibility
headline eligible
Identity
provider alias (0.94)
Source label
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Source row
n/a
Time to first answer token
AA · s
Text · Chat / text
19.34s40.5%
exact aliasverified runtime
Row details
Raw value
19.34s
Percentile
40.5%
Last updated
recent
Eligibility
headline eligible
Identity
provider alias (0.94)
Source label
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Source row
n/a
Blended price
AA · /1M tokens
Text · Chat / text
$3.4 /1M tokens18.1%
exact aliasverified runtime
Row details
Raw value
$3.4 /1M tokens
Percentile
18.1%
Last updated
recent
Eligibility
headline eligible
Identity
provider alias (0.94)
Source label
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (May' 25)
Source row
n/a
1-12 of 53
Page 1 of 5
Decisive benchmarks

What is doing the visible work

No decisive benchmark
The shared tests are too split or too sparse for a clean separator.
Decision pressure

What changes the winner

Gemini 2.5 Pro
61 visible benchmark gaps still leave room for the result to move.
Coverage gaps

Where evidence is missing

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Missing visible evidence on this compare surface
61
Preset interpretation

How this weighting reads the field

The current decision mode is grounded in the Coding copilot preset. This keeps the compare page connected to a visible use case instead of an unspoken “overall winner” claim.

score = 1.45 × coding + 1.05 × reasoning math science + 0.80 × long contextcoverage floor = 55% · recency window = 120 days
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
66.5%
Share or publish this compare resultlinks, copy, and advanced framings
Share this report

Share the recommendation with the source data attached.

Use the report for the full source trail, or the card image when the post needs a clean preview.

Model compareGemini 2.5 Pro leads this compare set for coding copilot.

0 shared benchmarks are still too close to call, so the win stays conditional. This compare uses all public sources, with provider-official evidence labeled separately.

Report/artifacts/compare?models=gemini-2-5-pro&mode=best-for-this-use-case&preset=coding-copilot
Card image/api/og?kind=compare&models=gemini-2-5-pro&mode=best-for-this-use-case&preset=coding-copilot
Public links

Open or copy the stable surfaces

The report is the canonical source page. The card image is the compact preview for embeds, screenshots, and social cards.

Open reportOpen card preview
Copy-ready text

Use the exact public framing

Each copy action keeps the recommendation attached to source data instead of forcing you into a blank composer.

Advanced framings and X composerNeutral, contrarian, open-model, and skeptical variants
Model compare

Pick the voice before you post

Use the framing variants only when you need them. The report and the public copy actions above should handle most cases.

Neutral analystLead with the recommendation, then attach the reason and warning.Gemini 2.5 Pro leads this compare set for coding copilot.
ContrarianPush against the easy read and keep the strongest alternative live.Contrarian take: Gemini 2.5 Pro leads this compare set for coding copilot.
Open-model angleBias the framing toward open weights and source transparency.Open-model angle: Model compare · Gemini 2.5 Pro
Don't trust the headlineLead with the warning before you let the claim travel.Don't trust the headline: Model compare · Gemini 2.5 Pro
X composer

Compose a post that keeps the warning attached

The post shell always exposes the recommendation, why, warning, source link, and an optional discussion question.

HeadlineGemini 2.5 Pro leads this compare set for coding copilot.
WhyThe visible source data changed enough to change the recommendation.
Warning0 shared benchmarks are still too close to call, so the win stays conditional. This compare uses all public sources, with provider-official evidence labeled separately.
Source link/artifacts/compare?models=gemini-2-5-pro&mode=best-for-this-use-case&preset=coding-copilot
PreviewOver 280
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads this compare set for coding copilot.
The visible source data changed enough to change the recommendation.
Warning: 0 shared benchmarks are still too close to call, so the win stays conditional. This compare uses all public sources, with provider-official evidence labeled separately.
Source data: /artifacts/compare?models=gemini-2-5-pro&mode=best-for-this-use-case&preset=coding-copilot
Open in XOpen card preview
Reading guide

How to read this workspace

Who wins most oftenBenchmarks with one clear percentile leader.Missing evidenceBenchmarks where a top model has no visible score.Decision readA public claim tied to an explicit use case and source filter.