UAB
Home/Compare
Compare
Live · updated continuously
Compare · pick a model

Compare the models people actually argue about.

Use shared tests, visible gaps, and close-call warnings before turning a benchmark lead into a public claim.
Selected models · 1
Shared benchmarks · 51
Current leader · Claude Opus 4.8
Compare controls

Keep the recommendation honest.

Use case and source filter stay visible up top. Edits, saves, follows, and links stay available without running the page.

Current frameBest for this use caseCoding copilot · All public sources
What should win?
Preset

Keep the same models, change the use case, and recompute the recommendation without resetting the page.

Sources
Models to compare

Keep the compare set tight. Add one model at a time, then prune aggressively.

1 / 6 models
Workspace utilities

Save, follow, or copy this exact setup only after the comparison looks right.

Claude Opus 4.8
Save or share this workspacefollow it, copy it, or reopen it later
Open reportOpen workspaces
Compare · Coding copilot · best for this use case

Claude Opus 4.8 leads this compare set for coding copilot.

Claude Opus 4.8no clear runner-up
Verified and stable

The current evidence supports a shortlist, not a single winner.

Shared tests
51
Close calls
0
Sources
All public
Open evidence pageInspect disagreement
Decision detail

Read this page as a workspace for choosing between top models, not as a universal crown. The current frame is Coding copilot under best for this use case.

Why the leader is ahead
Professional reasoning
Where the evidence is thin
0 close-call benchmarks and 63 missing missing leader rows keep this from reading as settled.
What to do next
Inspect decisive benchmarks first, then open the disagreement page or head-to-head pages if the top line still feels too narrow.
Open evidence pageInspect benchmark disagreement
51 of 114 benchmarks
Text Arena
AR · rating
Text · Chat / text
1,47897.2%
exact aliasverified runtime
Row details
Raw value
1,478
Percentile
97.2%
Last updated
recent
Eligibility
headline eligible
Identity
provider alias (0.92)
Source label
claude-opus-4-8
Source row
n/a
Code Arena
AR · rating
Code · Coding
1,54294.5%
exact aliasverified runtime
Row details
Raw value
1,542
Percentile
94.5%
Last updated
recent
Eligibility
headline eligible
Identity
provider alias (0.92)
Source label
claude-opus-4-8
Source row
n/a
Vision Arena
AR · rating
Vision · Vision understanding
1,28092.7%
exact aliasverified runtime
Row details
Raw value
1,280
Percentile
92.7%
Last updated
recent
Eligibility
headline eligible
Identity
provider alias (0.92)
Source label
claude-opus-4-8
Source row
n/a
WebDev Arena
AR · rating
Code · Coding
1,54294.5%
exact aliasverified runtime
Row details
Raw value
1,542
Percentile
94.5%
Last updated
recent
Eligibility
headline eligible
Identity
provider alias (0.92)
Source label
claude-opus-4-8
Source row
n/a
Search Arena
AR · rating
Search · Search / tool use
1,19473.3%
exact aliasverified runtime
Row details
Raw value
1,194
Percentile
73.3%
Last updated
recent
Eligibility
headline eligible
Identity
provider alias (0.92)
Source label
claude-opus-4-8
Source row
n/a
Document Arena
AR · rating
Document · Document understanding
1,48583.3%
exact aliasverified runtime
Row details
Raw value
1,485
Percentile
83.3%
Last updated
recent
Eligibility
headline eligible
Identity
provider alias (0.92)
Source label
claude-opus-4-8
Source row
n/a
Intelligence Index
AA · index
Text · Chat / text
5699.7%
exact aliasverified runtime
Row details
Raw value
56
Percentile
99.7%
Last updated
recent
Eligibility
headline eligible
Identity
provider alias (0.94)
Source label
Claude Opus 4.8 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
Source row
n/a
Time to first token
AA · s
Text · Chat / text
33.32s5.7%
exact aliasverified runtime
Row details
Raw value
33.32s
Percentile
5.7%
Last updated
recent
Eligibility
headline eligible
Identity
provider alias (0.94)
Source label
Claude Opus 4.8 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
Source row
n/a
Coding Index
AA · index
Code · Coding
7498.7%
exact aliasverified runtime
Row details
Raw value
74
Percentile
98.7%
Last updated
recent
Eligibility
headline eligible
Identity
provider alias (0.94)
Source label
Claude Opus 4.8 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
Source row
n/a
Agentic Index
AA · index
Code · Coding
4797.8%
exact aliasverified runtime
Row details
Raw value
47
Percentile
97.8%
Last updated
recent
Eligibility
headline eligible
Identity
provider alias (0.94)
Source label
Claude Opus 4.8 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
Source row
n/a
Output Speed
AA · tokens/s
Text · Chat / text
69.8 tokens/s37.6%
exact aliasverified runtime
Row details
Raw value
69.8 tokens/s
Percentile
37.6%
Last updated
recent
Eligibility
headline eligible
Identity
provider alias (0.94)
Source label
Claude Opus 4.8 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
Source row
n/a
Time to first answer token
AA · s
Text · Chat / text
33.32s22.4%
exact aliasverified runtime
Row details
Raw value
33.32s
Percentile
22.4%
Last updated
recent
Eligibility
headline eligible
Identity
provider alias (0.94)
Source label
Claude Opus 4.8 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
Source row
n/a
1-12 of 51
Page 1 of 5
Decisive benchmarks

What is doing the visible work

No decisive benchmark
The shared tests are too split or too sparse for a clean separator.
Decision pressure

What changes the winner

Claude Opus 4.8
63 visible benchmark gaps still leave room for the result to move.
Coverage gaps

Where evidence is missing

Claude Opus 4.8
Missing visible evidence on this compare surface
63
Preset interpretation

How this weighting reads the field

The current decision mode is grounded in the Coding copilot preset. This keeps the compare page connected to a visible use case instead of an unspoken “overall winner” claim.

score = 1.45 × coding + 1.05 × reasoning math science + 0.80 × long contextcoverage floor = 55% · recency window = 120 days
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
100%
Share or publish this compare resultlinks, copy, and advanced framings
Share this report

Share the recommendation with the source data attached.

Use the report for the full source trail, or the card image when the post needs a clean preview.

Model compareClaude Opus 4.8 leads this compare set for coding copilot.

0 shared benchmarks are still too close to call, so the win stays conditional. This compare uses all public sources, with provider-official evidence labeled separately.

Report/artifacts/compare?models=claude-opus-4-8&mode=best-for-this-use-case&preset=coding-copilot
Card image/api/og?kind=compare&models=claude-opus-4-8&mode=best-for-this-use-case&preset=coding-copilot
Public links

Open or copy the stable surfaces

The report is the canonical source page. The card image is the compact preview for embeds, screenshots, and social cards.

Open reportOpen card preview
Copy-ready text

Use the exact public framing

Each copy action keeps the recommendation attached to source data instead of forcing you into a blank composer.

Advanced framings and X composerNeutral, contrarian, open-model, and skeptical variants
Model compare

Pick the voice before you post

Use the framing variants only when you need them. The report and the public copy actions above should handle most cases.

Neutral analystLead with the recommendation, then attach the reason and warning.Claude Opus 4.8 leads this compare set for coding copilot.
ContrarianPush against the easy read and keep the strongest alternative live.Contrarian take: Claude Opus 4.8 leads this compare set for coding copilot.
Open-model angleBias the framing toward open weights and source transparency.Open-model angle: Model compare · Claude Opus 4.8
Don't trust the headlineLead with the warning before you let the claim travel.Don't trust the headline: Model compare · Claude Opus 4.8
X composer

Compose a post that keeps the warning attached

The post shell always exposes the recommendation, why, warning, source link, and an optional discussion question.

HeadlineClaude Opus 4.8 leads this compare set for coding copilot.
WhyThe visible source data changed enough to change the recommendation.
Warning0 shared benchmarks are still too close to call, so the win stays conditional. This compare uses all public sources, with provider-official evidence labeled separately.
Source link/artifacts/compare?models=claude-opus-4-8&mode=best-for-this-use-case&preset=coding-copilot
PreviewOver 280
Claude Opus 4.8 leads this compare set for coding copilot.
The visible source data changed enough to change the recommendation.
Warning: 0 shared benchmarks are still too close to call, so the win stays conditional. This compare uses all public sources, with provider-official evidence labeled separately.
Source data: /artifacts/compare?models=claude-opus-4-8&mode=best-for-this-use-case&preset=coding-copilot
Open in XOpen card preview
Reading guide

How to read this workspace

Who wins most oftenBenchmarks with one clear percentile leader.Missing evidenceBenchmarks where a top model has no visible score.Decision readA public claim tied to an explicit use case and source filter.